Population growth vital to meeting labour needs: minister

Ashley
Ashley Fitzpatrick
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

Kevin O’Brien hopes immigration will help offset temporary worker losses

Within the next two weeks, the provincial government will release a “what we heard” document on its coming population growth strategy, according to Advanced Education and Skills Minister Kevin O’Brien.

Kevin O’Brien — Photo by Kevin Curley/The Packet

He said he expects to publicly present the completed strategy and its recommendations this fall.

The plan — promised during the 2011 general election and, earlier this year, promised to be ready by Canada Day — stretches across government depart­ments and will be important in meeting the province’s future labour market needs.

Already, there are reports of businesses in Newfoundland and Labrador in specific areas hurting from tight labour market conditions, situations exacerbated in some cases by changes made in June to the federal temporary foreign worker program.

The changes restrict the hottest areas of the provincial economy from using the stop-gap of temporary foreign workers, who currently number about 3,000 in this province.

O’Brien said he is concerned about the effects of the program changes. 

He spoke to federal Employment and Social Development Minister Jason Kenney about the program two to three weeks ago and has a meeting with Kenney scheduled for next week. He said he has also discussed the province’s labour market issues with Chris Alexander, the federal minister of Citizenship and Immigration.

He said he wants higher ceilings for immigration to the province.

“The other piece is that with the challenges now in the temporary foreign worker program, I’ll be looking at all the programs within our department, such as the wage subsidy program, (so) that I can support businesses that are having challenges,” he told The Telegram.

“As well, I’ll be working within my provincial nominee program and the expressed entry program on permanent immigration, to try to offset some of the impact that these changes to the temporary Fforeign worker program would have on industry.”

Immigration, he said, is a priority for the provincial government and will be addressed as part of the population growth strategy.

The Progressive Conservative government released a stand-alone immigration strategy seven years ago, in March 2007. A youth retention and attraction strategy was published in November 2009.

There have also been incentives introduced to bump up the provincial birthrate. However, an increase in birthrate is more likely to help the situation in the long-term.

Statistics Canada estimates for Newfoundland and Labrador show overall outmigration from January to March 2014, but O’Brien noted for the 11 years from April 1, 2003 to April 1, 2014, the province recorded an overall net in-migration of about 5,300 people.

Unfortunately, the province lost about 76,000 people in the 11 years prior to that.

According to Liberal MHA Cathy Bennett, it is past time for a deeper discussion of what to do to address labour market needs and population growth.

The Telegram sat down with Bennett on the topic prior to the federal government’s announced changes to the temporary foreign worker program. Regardless of what was done with that bridging program, Bennett said the province can do more to promote immigration to the province for the long term.

She acknowledged immigration allowances are entirely within federal jurisdiction. However, she said more could be done at the provincial level to help retain new immigrants.

“There’s lots of reasons why people come. It isn’t just about the job. It’s about a life. And there’s a whole lot of things that have to be done as part of that,” she said, adding governments need to make sure “enablers” are in place.

She pointed to a roughly $1-million budget for the provincial Office of Immigration and Multiculturalism in 2014-15, as opposed to roughly $2 million in 2012 as a mark against the current government’s commitment to increased immigrant retention rates.

“I think it’s not just about the money. Part of what has to happen with immigration is we have to have dialogues with stakeholders. So we have to have ongoing dialogue with the immigrant community to find out where the (service) gaps are. We have to have dialogues with those organizations that are providing settlement services like the Association for New Canadians,” she said. “And I think it’s one thing to say you’re going to have a dialogue, it’s a whole heightened level of accountability when you commit to a scheduled dialogue.”

She said while people are not to be considered just as head counts, target numbers for immigration need to be reset and publicly stated as a reflection of a commitment to growth. The 2007 immigration strategy stated the province was attracting about 400 immigrants annually, with a retention rate of about 36 per cent — the lowest in Canada. The set target was 1,200 to 1,500 immigrants annually within five years, at a retention rate of 80 per cent for provincial nominees and 70 per cent for all other immigrants.

O’Brien said the province welcomed about 800 immigrants last year.

 

afitzpatrick@thetelegram.com

Organizations: The Telegram, Statistics Canada, Office of Immigration and Multiculturalism

Geographic location: Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • david Madsen
    December 10, 2015 - 07:15

    The fact of the matter is that with out even much higher yearly amounts of immigrants coming to Canada ... unless we can reach a minimum of 150.000.000 within the next twenty-five years; we will essentially reduce ourselves to global insignificance, national impotence in maintaining any form of advanced, skilled, or seats of importance. Our population base will simply be too marginal, too disseminated, and too distinct (stemming from vibrant regionalism). Sadly, it will become an enduring and regular event as our brightest, most talented and creatively productive children make the move ... but not away to college; no - south to the states. We are already unable to support any real venues of cultural and social expression. Not even a single magazine, let alone a newspaper... can thrive without government subsidization. For lack of any viable markets - we will continue to import at highly inflated prices practically every consumer good. Our entertainment outlets will not be the stunning wealth of Canadian artists; but rather the same as it currently is - a few Canadian productions lost in a sea of American banality. The precariously fragile connections containing any semblance of national identity and shared cultural commonality is only going to weaken even moreso. As to our presence globally - we will have rendered ourselves reduced to a polite insignificance. Practically every African and Asian country will have surpassed us in global importance merely by virtue of population mass and the concurrent weight of presence in international affairs. We will be regarded as basically not much more than a resource extraction based ecconomy (lacking any more potent development or sophisticated sectors and development. Sadly, we will think the ones able to retire in Florida or Arizona as the lucky ones. Dithering away to a nothingness ... those provinces affording so - will slowly drift away ... then just declare some form of Independence ... and so terribly wrong - Canada will evolve into a collection of states sharing various services and adamantly distant on others. Canada will be study material in a true attempt to provide the highest quality of life to as many of it's citizens; but dispersion of any meaningful population base only even fed into bickering regionalism ... and essentially inaction tore the country apart. This is the reality of not including the reality of mass immigration - not just from Asia ... The overwhelming number of Europeans desiring to enjoy their lives in Canada would amaze you. So one needn't fret about cultural overload ... there is room enough for everyone. Think of a Canada that doesn't watch her genius and talent performing in the states. Or thriving industries spanning the realm of human knowledge. Think of having a strong and respected global presence. Or think about buying "scratch and wins" in hopes you can retire to Phoenix, too.

  • david Madsen
    December 10, 2015 - 07:13

    The fact of the matter is that with out even much higher yearly amounts of immigrants coming to Canada ... unless we can reach a minimum of 150.000.000 within the next twenty-five years; we will essentially reduce ourselves to global insignificance, national impotence in maintaining any form of advanced, skilled, or seats of importance. Our population base will simply be too marginal, too disseminated, and too distinct (stemming from vibrant regionalism). Sadly, it will become an enduring and regular event as our brightest, most talented and creatively productive children make the move ... but not away to college; no - south to the states. We are already unable to support any real venues of cultural and social expression. Not even a single magazine, let alone a newspaper... can thrive without government subsidization. For lack of any viable markets - we will continue to import at highly inflated prices practically every consumer good. Our entertainment outlets will not be the stunning wealth of Canadian artists; but rather the same as it currently is - a few Canadian productions lost in a sea of American banality. The precariously fragile connections containing any semblance of national identity and shared cultural commonality is only going to weaken even moreso. As to our presence globally - we will have rendered ourselves reduced to a polite insignificance. Practically every African and Asian country will have surpassed us in global importance merely by virtue of population mass and the concurrent weight of presence in international affairs. We will be regarded as basically not much more than a resource extraction based ecconomy (lacking any more potent development or sophisticated sectors and development. Sadly, we will think the ones able to retire in Florida or Arizona as the lucky ones. Dithering away to a nothingness ... those provinces affording so - will slowly drift away ... then just declare some form of Independence ... and so terribly wrong - Canada will evolve into a collection of states sharing various services and adamantly distant on others. Canada will be study material in a true attempt to provide the highest quality of life to as many of it's citizens; but dispersion of any meaningful population base only even fed into bickering regionalism ... and essentially inaction tore the country apart. This is the reality of not including the reality of mass immigration - not just from Asia ... The overwhelming number of Europeans desiring to enjoy their lives in Canada would amaze you. So one needn't fret about cultural overload ... there is room enough for everyone. Think of a Canada that doesn't watch her genius and talent performing in the states. Or thriving industries spanning the realm of human knowledge. Think of having a strong and respected global presence. Or think about buying "scratch and wins" in hopes you can retire to Phoenix, too.

  • Brad
    July 02, 2014 - 17:30

    Everyone keeps saying there is a shortage and there are lots of jobs available, but where are they? I am an Accountant, have 3+ years of experience, shooting for a designation and have been out of work since February due to a corporate restructuring. If something doesn't come soon, I have no choice but to leave. It's a shame because this province has the potential to be something great, but old school thinking in some aspects is what's holding the place back. Hard work doesn't get you ahead anymore.

  • Corporate Psycho
    July 02, 2014 - 17:14

    Anyone notice the price of food at the grocery store? Gone through the roof.

  • Mr. T
    July 02, 2014 - 11:40

    We need to keep people here period, not just to fill minimum wage jobs. Why not give parents a break with Daycare? Maybe people already living here will decide to have more children, and we can grow the population that way. We paid nearly $25,000 for daycare last year for two kids.

  • Sick of the SHills
    July 02, 2014 - 09:45

    People will stay in areas where they can support themselves and their families. Good luck doing that on $10 and hour. a family with both parents working full time at those rates are barely keeping above the poverty line. Cheaper labour will not reduce the cost of living; that is the REAL problem facing our province.

  • J
    July 02, 2014 - 07:30

    You might want to worry about how to keep the Newfoundlanders here who moved back from somewhere else as well.